Planet of the Apes
Original Planet Of The Apes (1968)
Remake Rise of The Planet of the Apes 2011
What production companies produced each film?
The 1968 one was produced by APJAC Productions and distributed by 20th Century Fox
Rise of the planet of the apes was produced by Dune Entertainment, Chernin Entertainment
Big Screen Productions, Ingenious Film Partners and distributed 20th Century Fox.
Do any of these companies own any cinemas ?
20 Century Fox does not own any cinemas,but it has subsidiary studios
Which country or countries did the funding come from for both films?
The funding for the movies were from the United States, which is a hollywood developing country and is an international cooperation.
Can either film be considered an ‘independent’ or ‘mainstream’ film?
Both films are mainstream films, meaning they were released world wide.
Did they receive any funding from ‘funding bodies’? These should be listed in the film's company credits on imdb.
The 1968 movie received a funding of $5,799,157, whereas the 2011 movie received $93 million
What technologies ( film format, sound mix, cameras) were used in the production? (check imdb technical specifications).
Full Technical Aspects for the 1968 Planet of the Apes
| Runtime | 1 hr 52 min (112 min) 1 hr 55 min (115 min) (Argentina) 1 hr 47 min (107 min) (DVD edition) (Spain) |
| Sound Mix | 4-Track Stereo (Westrex Recording System) |
| Color | Color |
| Aspect Ratio | 2.35 : 1 |
| Laboratory | DeLuxe (color by) (as De Luxe) |
| Film Length | 3,060 m |
| Negative Format | 35 mm |
| Cinematographic Process | Panavision (anamorphic) (as Panavision®) |
| Printed Film Format | 35 mm |
Full Technical aspects for Rise of the Planet of the Apes
| Runtime | 1 hr 45 min (105 min) |
| Sound Mix | SDDS | Datasat | Dolby Digital |
| Color | Color |
| Aspect Ratio | 2.35 : 1 |
| Camera | Arricam LT, Zeiss Master Prime and Angenieux Optimo Lenses Arriflex 435, Zeiss Master Prime and Angenieux Optimo Lenses |
| Laboratory | DeLuxe, Vancouver, Canada (laboratory and telecine services) EFILM Digital Laboratories, Hollywood (CA), USA (digital intermediate) |
| Film Length | 2,890 m (Portugal, 35mm) 2,919 m (Spain) |
| Negative Format | 35 mm (Kodak Vision3 250D 5207, Vision3 500T 5219) |
| Cinematographic Process | Digital Intermediate (2K) (master format) Super 35 (source format) |
| Printed Film Format | 35 mm (anamorphic) (Fuji Eterna-CP 3514DI) D-Cinema |
Who distributed the films in the UK? ( company credits on imdb )
In the UK the films were distributed by 20th Century Fox Studios
Do they fit into a particular genre or ‘cycle’ of films?
Both movies fit into the action and fantasy genre
Do they have any stars?
Both films do not any stars on the IMDB website.
What certificate did they receive in the UK, and why did they receive that certificate?
The1968 Planet of the Apes was given a certificate rating of 12, whereas the Rise of the planet of the Apes was given a 15. The reason why the Rise of the Planet of the Apes is a 15 is because of the violent content within the movie.
Are they part of a series of films i.e sequels?
In total there 7 'Ape' movies. The order goes as follows;Planet of the Apes (1968),
Beneath the Planet of the Apes, Escape from the planet of the Apes,
Conquest of the Planet of the Apes, Battle for the Planet of the Apes. Then the remake of the 1968; Planet of the Apes (2001). Then comes a reboot of the 2001; Rise of the planet of the Apes Then the sequel; Dawn of the Planet of the Apes
No comments:
Post a Comment